Difference between revisions of "Photoelectron Spectrometer XPS and UPS"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cmditradmin (talk | contribs) |
Cmditradmin (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
We use high-vacuum surface electron spectroscopies: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and UV-photoelectron spectroscopy to provide the elemental, molecular and energetic information we require about these materials. | We use high-vacuum surface electron spectroscopies: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and UV-photoelectron spectroscopy to provide the elemental, molecular and energetic information we require about these materials. | ||
XPS uses high energy X-ray photons to excite “core” electrons in the near-surface region UPS uses lower energy photons in the deep UV region to excite valence electrons.[[Image: | XPS uses high energy X-ray photons to excite “core” electrons in the near-surface region UPS uses lower energy photons in the deep UV region to excite valence electrons.[[Image:800px-Surface_electron_spectroscopies.jpg]] |
Revision as of 12:46, 21 April 2009
What is the Problem? OLEDs and OPVs consist of thin films of organic materials, sandwiched between contacting electrodes. We need analytical tools which tell us:
- Elemental composition of metal, metal oxide and organic surfaces (top 1-10 nm)
- The molecular state of those elements in that same region
- The frontier orbital energies which control rates of charge transfer, photopotentials, onset voltages, etc.
What is our approach? We use high-vacuum surface electron spectroscopies: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and UV-photoelectron spectroscopy to provide the elemental, molecular and energetic information we require about these materials.
XPS uses high energy X-ray photons to excite “core” electrons in the near-surface region UPS uses lower energy photons in the deep UV region to excite valence electrons.File:800px-Surface electron spectroscopies.jpg