Difference between revisions of "Major Processes in Organic Solar Cells"

From CleanEnergyWIKI
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 37: Line 37:
===Photovoltaic Efficiency===
===Photovoltaic Efficiency===
[[Image:currentvoltagecurve1.jpg|thumb|300px|]]
[[Image:currentvoltagecurve1.jpg|thumb|300px|]]
Ideally photovoltaic devices behave like diodes, with dark current/voltage (J/V) curves following the Schockely equation -- in the dark in the reverse bias direction little measurable current flows, whereas in the forward bias direction, current increases exponentially with applied voltage.  When the OPV (diode) is illuminated, the J/V curve is ideally shifted down at all potentials by the magnitude of Jsc, the short-circuit photocurrent.  It is in the third quadrant of the J/V curve (see figure) where power is generated in an external load.
Ideally photovoltaic devices behave like diodes, with dark current/voltage (''J/V'') curves following the Schockely equation -- in the dark in the reverse bias direction little measurable current flows, whereas in the forward bias direction, current increases exponentially with applied voltage.  When the OPV (diode) is illuminated, the ''J/V'' curve is ideally shifted down at all potentials by the magnitude of ''J<sub>sc</sub>'', the short-circuit photocurrent.  It is in the third quadrant of the ''J/V'' curve (see figure) where power is generated in an external load.


The maximum power obtainable from an ideal OPV is the product of Jsc and the "open-circuit" photovoltage Voc (the voltage obtained for this device at zero current) (Ptheor = Jsc*Voc).  Real OPVs, however, generate substantially less power, which can be defined where real current/voltage products reach their maximum value: Pmax = Jmax*Vmax.  The power conversion efficiency is then defined: (Pmax/Pinput)*FF where Pinput is the power from the illumination source (sun) and FF is the "fill factor" defined as Pmax/Ptheor.  Under AM1.5 solar illumination conditions, most OPVs 0.4 < Voc < 0.8 volts, 5 mA/cm2 < Jsc < 15 mA/cm2, and 0.4 < FF < 0.7, leading to power conversion efficiencies of 1-6%.
The maximum power obtainable from an ideal OPV is the product of ''J<sub>sc</sub>'' and the "open-circuit" photovoltage ''V<sub>oc</sub>'' (the voltage obtained for this device at zero current) (P<sub>theor</sub> = J<sub>sc</sub>*V<sub>oc</sub>).  Real OPVs, however, generate substantially less power, which can be defined where real current/voltage products reach their maximum value: P<sub>max</sub> = ''J<sub>max</sub>''*''V<sub>max</sub>''.  The power conversion efficiency is then defined: (P<sub>max</sub>/P<sub>input</sub><sub></sub>)*FF where P<sub>input</sub> is the power from the illumination source (sun) and ''FF'' is the "fill factor" defined as Pmax/Ptheor.  Under AM1.5 solar illumination conditions, most OPVs 0.4 < ''V<sub>oc</sub>'' < 0.8 volts, 5 mA/cm2 < ''J<sub>sc</sub>'' < 15 mA/cm<sup>2</sup>, and 0.4 < ''FF'' < 0.7, leading to power conversion efficiencies of 1-6%.





Revision as of 14:22, 9 June 2009

Previous Topic Return to OPV Menu Next Topic


Edmond Becquerel (1820-1891) was first to discover the photovoltaic effect. But it took quite a long time before there was a report on an efficient cell and that came from Chapin, Fuller and Pearson (1954) in Bell Labs. They reported a silicon cell with 6% efficiency.

Semiconductor Fundamentals

Semiconductors compared

LEDs and photovolataics are opposite processes.

This slide gives a comparison of the processes that take place in organic light emitting dioes (OLEDs) and in organic solar cells (OPVs).

In an OLED the first step toward creating light requires injection of charge carriers from the contacting electrodes. Holes typically are injected into the hole-transport layer (HTL) at the bottom, transparent contact, electrons are typically injected at the top metallic contact into the electron transport layer (ETL). The next steps involve migration of these charge carriers toward the center of the device under the influence of the applied field. The rates of charge migration are field dependent, and dependent upon the mobilities of both holes in the HTL and electrons in the ETL. In the center of the device, at the HTL/ETL interface, these injected charges (which reside on molecular species as radical cations and radical anions, or polaronic states), must find each other and recombine to form an excited (excitonic) state, from which emission occurs to create the light in the OLED display. Exciton migration, energy transfer to dopants in the OLED, and energy losses occur afterward -- the entire process from injection to emission of a photon is over typically in well under one microsecond.

An organic photovoltaic cell works in a complementary fashion. Light is absorbed in either of two donor (D) or acceptor (A) layers, creating excitonic states which must diffuse to the D/A interface where differences in ionization potential and electron affinities of D and A cause these excited states to dissociate into free charge carriers (electrons and holes residing on molecular species). The combination of diffusion and migration of these charge carriers to the collection electrodes, and the harvesting of these charges by these electrodes, produces a cureent in the external circuit, as a specific voltage, the product of which is the power produced by the OPV.

Field effect transistors

Field effect transistor.png

When you look at the field-effect transistors there are three major processes. The first one is the injection of charges into your semi-conductor. In the case of light-emitting diode and photovoltaic cell there are only two electrodes. However, in a field-effect transistor, the charge injection is modulated through a third electrode called a gate. Now all is needed are the electrons and the holes. Let’s suppose you inject electrons. Those electrons must migrate and be collected. The first electrode will be referred to as a gate. Then you have a thin insulator called a dielectric. You have two other electrodes referred to as the source and the drain. Then you have your organic semi-conductor. This is one of the configurations possible. When you are given a voltage difference between the source and drain, the amount of charges that will be injected into your semi-conductor will be modulated by the voltage at the gate. The gate will modulate the injection and produce a switching effect. For a given voltage between the source and drain, the voltage of the gate can either be decreased such that there is a small injection or current or it can be increased to have a very large injection of charges into your semi-conductor and a large current. These are the components that make a transistor, which is also called a three terminal devices because you have 3 electrodes. So once you have an injection of charges into the organic semi-conductor, those charges will travel and be collected at the other electrodes. These are the main steps in an organic semi-conductor; charge injection, charge transport, and charge collection.

Energy conversion in OPVs

Light absorption

The most efficient OPVs currently have bandgap energies at or above 1.5 eV, which means that they are transparent to much of the near-IR and red regions of the visible wavelength spectrum. These are the regions of maximum solar flux, therefore there has been a great deal of attention focussed on creating organic donor and acceptor layers with lower bandgaps, without sacrificing either chemical stability or photopotential (see below).

Inorganic semiconductors are better matched in their bandgap energies to the solar spectrum, but have lower absorptivities than organic materials, requiring thicker absorbing layers, and high purities (and high costs) to insure efficient operation.

Another key difference between OPVs and conventional inorganic solar cells is in the exciton binding energy. In both systems excitons (excited states) are formed upon photon absorption. In inorganic semiconductors the energy required to dissociate these excitons into charge carriers is quite small (a few milli-electron volts, easily achieved at room temperature). In organic semiconductors the "exciton binding energy" can be as high as 0.5 eV or higher, requiring the formation of a D/A heterojunction (see below) to provide the internal electrochemical driving force for exciton dissociation to occur.

Photovoltaic Efficiency

Currentvoltagecurve1.jpg

Ideally photovoltaic devices behave like diodes, with dark current/voltage (J/V) curves following the Schockely equation -- in the dark in the reverse bias direction little measurable current flows, whereas in the forward bias direction, current increases exponentially with applied voltage. When the OPV (diode) is illuminated, the J/V curve is ideally shifted down at all potentials by the magnitude of Jsc, the short-circuit photocurrent. It is in the third quadrant of the J/V curve (see figure) where power is generated in an external load.

The maximum power obtainable from an ideal OPV is the product of Jsc and the "open-circuit" photovoltage Voc (the voltage obtained for this device at zero current) (Ptheor = Jsc*Voc). Real OPVs, however, generate substantially less power, which can be defined where real current/voltage products reach their maximum value: Pmax = Jmax*Vmax. The power conversion efficiency is then defined: (Pmax/Pinput)*FF where Pinput is the power from the illumination source (sun) and FF is the "fill factor" defined as Pmax/Ptheor. Under AM1.5 solar illumination conditions, most OPVs 0.4 < Voc < 0.8 volts, 5 mA/cm2 < Jsc < 15 mA/cm2, and 0.4 < FF < 0.7, leading to power conversion efficiencies of 1-6%.


OPV Fabrication and Testing

Steps of Organic Photoelectric Process

Light absorption (exciton formation)

Opv15-photonabsorption.JPG

Suppose you have a crystalline silicon that absorbs a photon from the solar spectrum, which leads to an excited state. The exciton binding energy is so small that the electron and hole can separate and thus, a current can be produced. However, in an organic material, the absorption of a photon creates a strongly bound exciton. Remember that an exciton is a neutral species. When you have the electron and the hole next to one another, the charge is 0 since 1+ + 1- = 0. A current can not be generated from an exciton. This is why crystalline silicon can perfectly lead to an absorption to the generation of free carriers also known as band to band process. Suppose you form an exciton on a polythiophene chain. To generate a current, you must disassociate the exciton, meaning, separate the electron and the hole in the exciton so that they can move away from one another and generate current.

Exciton Migration

Opv16 migration.JPG

This is the key point that makes the processes in an organic solar cell different from the processes in a crystalline silicon or amorphous silicon solar cell. That is the fact that in the pi- conjugated materials, you have large binding energies. Excitons must be formed and disassociated to generate a current. The structure of the organic cells includes a component that corresponds to an electron donor and a component that corresponds to an electron acceptor. There is an interface between those two components where the excitons must reach in order to disassociate. The critical condition for an efficient organic solar cell is the fact that the exciton can diffuse a pretty large distance within its lifetime. If the interface on average is 20 nanometers from where the exciton is generated, but during its lifetime the exciton only diffuses 5 nanometers, no current will be produced. You will have photons in and photons out or vibrations out or anything similar but a current will not be generated. In other words, during its lifetime, the exciton must be able to diffuse and reach the interface between the donor and acceptor components. If a system is designed with large diffusion lengths and the migration of the exciton takes too long, then the average distance between where the exciton is generated and the interface can be reduced. This results in thinner films. However, if the film too thin, only a few number of photons can be absorbed. This is a type of issue many organic cells engineers deal with. The film must be thick enough to absorb a reasonable amount of photons, but simultaneously, the film must also be thin enough so that the generated excitons can reach the interface efficiently.

Charge separation (exciton dissociation)

Opv17 chargeseparation.JPG

This state diagram shows what happens when the exciton reaches the interface. The D refers to the donor component and A refers to the acceptor component. At the interface there are donor molecules or donor polymer chains next to the acceptor molecules or acceptor polymer chains. The lowest energy state is the ground state of the two components. Suppose that the exciton is formed within the donor. This exciton will be labeled D*, an excited state in the donor. The exciton must reach the interface. There is a state and energy there that corresponds to the exciton energy above the ground state. What needs to happen is that the exciton at the interface must get into a charge transfer state in which then the electron finds itself on the electron acceptor and therefore, there is a hole on the donor component. Now we have what we call a charge transfer state D+ A-. The + and – now need to move away from one another. This process is called a charge separated state. So you need not only to have a charge transfer but to have a charge separation. In the literature, the use of these terminologies can be confusing depending on the community you from a state like this could be in a molecule. For instance, people might say this is a charge separated state. It is possible to have a charge transfer state where the + and the – remain close to each other. However, in order to generate a electrical current a full separation of the + and the – is needed. So that is the distinction between a CT(Charge transfer) state and a CS(Charge separation) state shown on the diagram/slide. At the CT state, when the hole and electron, the D+ and A-, are next to each other, there is a chance that they will recombine (aka recombination) and lead to the ground state. If this happens a loss in terms of efficiency of the charge separation process will occur. Recombination is the main reason for the low efficiencies of OPVs.

The goal is to maximize kct(charge transfer) and kcs(charge separation) and minimize kcr(charge recombination). The rate of transfer and of charge separation need to be maximized while the rate of charge recombination must be minimized. With those rates, you can also evaluate the Marcus Theory expressions.


Charge Migration

Opv19migration.JPG

Inorganic solar cells can be very efficient because a single inorganic material can be used with an exciton binding energy is negligible at room temperature. The physics of organic solar cells very different because the exciton is strongly bound. You need to have an acceptor and donor component with as much interface as possible between them in order that the formed excitons can quickly reach the interface to disassociate. Once the excitons have disassociated into two separated species, the electron and the hole, they must move efficiently toward the electrodes. Remember that the more you can order your material, in general, the better the mobility will be. The faster the electrons and the holes can move away from each other, the more efficient their separation will be.

Electronic energy Levels

Opv18 energylevel.JPG

In the literature, people will refer to the exciton states and the charge transfer state which is when the donor + and the acceptor – are right next to each other. But the electron and the hole still feel each other rather strongly. This charge transfer state CT1 is the lowest in energy precisely because the electron and the hole are strongly bound together. Remember, the stronger the attraction between the + and – charges, the lower the energy state. So the lowest energy charge transfer state has the strongest coulomb attraction between the hole and electron. Therefore, to separate the charges, energy must be applied and a higher energy state must be acquired. In the literature there are a number of models that can show how this can be achieved. But it would be much simpler to just go from S1 to higher lying charge states CTn and then to CS=Efinal rather then going all the way down to CT1 and then to the final state. With atomic energy levels, the higher the energy level of a state, the farther away the electron is from the nucleus. By making the connection and comparing with the atomic energy levels, the higher the energy of a charge transfer state, the lesser the attraction is between the electron and the hole, and therefore, the further away the two species are from one another. So if a higher lying charge transfer state is achieved, that state will be more diffused; the wave functions will be more delocalized. If instead of having the exciton come at the interface and then having the plus and minus right next to each other instead the plus is far removed from the minus because the wave functions are much more delocalized, you can intuitively understand that it will be easier for the plus and minus to move away from one another. So this is the picture that is now discussed in the literature.

Previous Topic Return to OPV Menu Next Topic